Utility of dental records available in Costa Rica in 2018 for the identification of disaster victims according to the INTERPOL protocols

Authors

  • José Manuel Fernández Chaves Especialista en Odontología Forense. Patología y Cirugía Oral. Universidad de Costa Rica. Organismo de Investigación Judicial, Unidad de Odontología Forense. Heredia, Costa Rica.

Keywords:

Dental record, antemortem, postmortem, human identification, disasters

Abstract

Introduction: The identification by dental methods has proven its effectiveness for a long time, but in recent years it has played a determining role in the identification of victims of mass disasters and crimes against humanity. One of the determining factors for positive identification is the quality of antemortem information. The purpose of the present investigation was to establish the quality of the information collected in the dental records during the year 2018 in Costa Rica with respect to the information contemplated in the INTERPOL protocols. Materials and methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study, in which a questionnaire was conducted based on the information requested in the INTERPOL antemortem and postmortem forms for identification of disaster victims (DVI). A pilot questionnaire was carried out and applied to 10 dentists, later a calibrated final questionnaire was done electronically through the College of Dental Surgeons of Costa Rica in the Google Docs platform; the results were analyzed by means of frequency distributions, crossing of variables, comparison of means based on analysis of variance. The minimum confidence level for the comparisons was 95%. The statistical processing of the data was done in the database called SPSS version 17.0 and in Excel. Results: A total of 573 questionnaires were answered, of which 76% are women; the distribution is independent of age (p = 0.161). 90.2% of dentists generally elaborate a dental clinical record for their patients, 8.4% sometimes do not and 1.4% do not always do it. 69% of the interviewees indicate that the information that they collect in the dental clinical file can be useful for the identification of a person, 19% indicate that they do not know that this information can be used for identification and 12% indicate that it is not Useful. Conclusions: The dental clinical file is extremely useful to collaborate in the process of identification of fatalities, however there is a large amount of non-dental information that can be collected by dentists to facilitate the identification of human beings.

References

1-Athenea Dental Institute. La Odontología Forense, Clave en las Investigaciones Judiciales. Centro de Formación Odontológico. Barcelona-España. (Actualizado enero de 2018, consultado en julio de 2018). Disponible en: http://atheneainstitute.com/odontologia-foreenseclave-investigaciones-judiciales/

2-Heit O, Arcushin A, Gonzales C. La catástrofe del bazar de la Caridad de París, nacimiento de la Odontología Legal. Revista del Colegio de Odontólogos de entre Ríos. Argentina. 2016.

3-INTERPOL. Guía de INTERPOL para la identificación de Víctimas de Catástrofes (IVC). (Modificaciones propuestas en marzo del 2014).

4-Congreso de Colombia. Ley 38 de 1993. Carta dental para fines de identificación. Colombia. 15 de enero de 1993.

5-Sanabria C. Osorio H. Ciencias forenses y Antropología Forense en el posconflicto Colombiano. Revista Criminalidad, Colombia. 2015. 57 (3): 119-134.

6-INTERPOL. INTERPOL Tsunami Evaluation Working Group. The DVI Response to the South East Asian Tsunami Between December 2004 and February 2006.

7-Cubillo M. Archivo de Huellas Genéticas de Costa Rica, consideraciones constitucionales, procesales y desde la óptica del derecho de protección de datos. “tesis de Grado”. Universidad de Costa Rica. Marzo 2012.

8-Fallas, L., Corrales, A., Fernández , J. Análisis de huellas labiales en una muestra de estudiantes de odontología de la Universidad de Costa Rica mediante la clasificación de Renaud: Estudio Piloto. Revista Medicina Legal de Costa Rica, Costa Rica. Vol. 35(2) 2018. pp 20-36.

9-Martínez J. Propuesta de una simbología odontológica y su utilidad en el análisis de la diversidad dental para la identificación forense. “tesis doctoral”. Universidad de Granada. España. 2013.

10. Rodríguez, C. D. Antropología dental prehispánica: variación y distancias biológicas en la población enterrada en el cementerio prehispánico de Obando, Valle del Cauca, Colombia entre los siglos VIII y XIII d.C. Miami, Syllaba Press, 2003. pp.29-103.

11. Rodríguez, C. D. La antropología dental y su importancia en el estudio de los grupos humanos. Rev. Fac. Odont. Univ. Ant., 16(1-2):52-9, 2005.

12. Zoubov, A. A. La antropología dental y la práctica forense. Maguaré, 13:243-52, 1998.

13. Hanihara K. Mongoloid dental complex in the deciduous dentition. J Anthrop Soc Nippon 1966; 74: 9-20.

14. Código de Ética del Colegio de cirujanos dentistas de Costa Rica [Internet]. 2011. [citado
el 26 de agosto de 2018]. Disponible en: http://www.colegiodentistas.org/sitCol/leyes-yreglamentos/

Published

2020-11-15

How to Cite

Utility of dental records available in Costa Rica in 2018 for the identification of disaster victims according to the INTERPOL protocols. (2020). Medicina Legal De Costa Rica, 36(1). https://www.binasss.sa.cr/ojssalud/index.php/mlcr/article/view/109